<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 14USC89 Is Taking A Break</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.14usc89.com/2010/02/14usc89-com-is-taking-a-break/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.14usc89.com/2010/02/14usc89-com-is-taking-a-break/</link>
	<description>Maritime Law Enforcement Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:29:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lawler @ 14USC89.com</title>
		<link>http://www.14usc89.com/2010/02/14usc89-com-is-taking-a-break/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawler @ 14USC89.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.14usc89.com/?p=512#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Actually, the email address is all over the site. On the side bars, the &quot;about this site&quot; page, the reading list page, and of course at the end of each post where it says contact the author. :) Anyway, about the LEOSA...I&#039;m not even going to attempt to add clarification on that issue. There is no &quot;official&quot; USCG position on the matter. It&#039;s pretty cut and dry in regards to the text in the authorization. I would be most concerned about your commands position on the matter and your states carry laws in general. Your best bet is to join in on the 128 page discussion over on the military.com USCG discussion boards. Rumor has it the new MLEM will address it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the email address is all over the site. On the side bars, the &#8220;about this site&#8221; page, the reading list page, and of course at the end of each post where it says contact the author. <img src='http://www.14usc89.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Anyway, about the LEOSA&#8230;I&#8217;m not even going to attempt to add clarification on that issue. There is no &#8220;official&#8221; USCG position on the matter. It&#8217;s pretty cut and dry in regards to the text in the authorization. I would be most concerned about your commands position on the matter and your states carry laws in general. Your best bet is to join in on the 128 page discussion over on the military.com USCG discussion boards. Rumor has it the new MLEM will address it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTF</title>
		<link>http://www.14usc89.com/2010/02/14usc89-com-is-taking-a-break/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>JTF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.14usc89.com/?p=512#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Where can I email you at? I looked all over the site and couldn&#039;t find a &quot;Contact me&quot; section... 

My question was whether you had looked into the applicability of the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act (LEOSA) to Coast Guard members? I know of one court case where the judge upheld LEOSA applying to a boarding team member. I&#039;ve just never heard any clear direction on it, and it would be hugely helpful for off duty carrying...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where can I email you at? I looked all over the site and couldn&#8217;t find a &#8220;Contact me&#8221; section&#8230; </p>
<p>My question was whether you had looked into the applicability of the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act (LEOSA) to Coast Guard members? I know of one court case where the judge upheld LEOSA applying to a boarding team member. I&#8217;ve just never heard any clear direction on it, and it would be hugely helpful for off duty carrying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ME1 R.</title>
		<link>http://www.14usc89.com/2010/02/14usc89-com-is-taking-a-break/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>ME1 R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.14usc89.com/?p=512#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Hey Lawler.  Don&#039;t get discouraged.  A simple way to not violate OPSEC is to post only things available via open source networks or any message that says &#039;internet release authorized&#039;.  You would be REALLY surprised at the amount of information that is available on the open web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Lawler.  Don&#8217;t get discouraged.  A simple way to not violate OPSEC is to post only things available via open source networks or any message that says &#8216;internet release authorized&#8217;.  You would be REALLY surprised at the amount of information that is available on the open web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
